Re: [boost] [gsoc] Interest in BGL v2?

Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc] Interest in BGL v2?
From: Gordon Woodhull (gordon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-31 22:56:33

On Mar 31, 2011, at 10:20 PM, Mostafa <mostafa_working_away_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Can you elaborate?

Thanks Mostafa. I have the same Q.

Back in the day Jeremy told me he thought wrapper classes could be as efficient as function wrappers, but he couldn't convince others, thus BGL is functional.  But I do remember seeing some convincing arguments against wrappers since then.

Also, do concept maps (RIP) fix this? I seem to remember some blurring between OO and functional there.

Thanks,
Gordon