Subject: Re: [boost] [GSOC]SIMD Library
From: Joel Falcou (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-01 03:20:21
On 01/04/11 01:12, Cory Nelson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:07 AM, Mathias Gaunard
> <mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On 31/03/2011 11:47, Cory Nelson wrote:
>>> What would ever make intrinsics improper?
>> GCC generates a compile-time error if you include the intrinsics files
>> without the right option (-msse2 or similar) enabled with the compiler.
>> For this reason, we took care of only including the files requested by the
>> instruction set the user has chosen.
>> Now then, I guess it would always be possible to cheat and redefine those
> Is there a way to detect those compile options?
-mssex defines _SSEX_ adn this macro is checked in the intrinsic files
so you cant include sseX intrinsic if -msseX was not set.
> I think it would be acceptable to just disable any support for them if -msse etc. aren't
> given, and put a warning in the docs explaining it. Does -msse/etc.
> only enable those intrinsics, or does GCC actually try to use them
> during code gen for plain C++?
We have to explore this. After giving some thought the need for non
binary level of cross instruction set support is indeed valuable.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk