Subject: Re: [boost] [locale] Formal review of Boost.Locale library starts tomorrow
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-08 10:48:16
I've started reading through the documentation
and just on the main page, there are several
expressions that I find slightly awkward. I've
also tried to come up with a better phrasing for
...to provide localization in transparent...
add an article to get
...to provide localization in a transparent...
On the other hand, there is a great, ... ICU library...
change a to the
On the other hand, there is the great, ... ICU library...
It is based on the operating system native API or
on the standard C++ library support.
It is based on the operating system's native API or
on the C++ standard library.
Should I just create a patch for all such things?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk