Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [locale] Formal review of Boost.Local library -- need reviews!
From: Artyom (artyomtnk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-15 10:43:25

Next message: Gevorg Voskanyan: "Re: [boost] [locale] review part 2.2: source"
Previous message: Artyom: "Re: [boost] Fw: [locale] Formal review of Boost.Locale library"
In reply to: Sebastian Redl: "Re: [boost] [locale] Formal review of Boost.Local library -- need reviews!"
Next in thread: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [locale] Formal review of Boost.Local library -- need reviews!"

> > And finally, every review should answer this question:
> >
> > - Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library?
> >
>
> Yes.
>
> Sebastian

Thanks for the review and the vote.

Artyom

Next message: Gevorg Voskanyan: "Re: [boost] [locale] review part 2.2: source"
Previous message: Artyom: "Re: [boost] Fw: [locale] Formal review of Boost.Locale library"
In reply to: Sebastian Redl: "Re: [boost] [locale] Formal review of Boost.Local library -- need reviews!"
Next in thread: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [locale] Formal review of Boost.Local library -- need reviews!"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk