Subject: Re: [boost] [locale] Formal review of Boost.Locale library EXTENDED
From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-19 09:05:44
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tuesday, April 19, 2011, Edward Diener wrote:
> My pick is to use what the language currently provides, which is
> wchar_t, which can represent UTF-16, a popular Unicode variant which
> also happens to be the standard for wide characters on Windows, which
> just happens to be the dominant operating system in the world ( by alot
> ) in terms of end-users.
I thought the standard was pretty loose about wchar_t, and that it could
even legally be a single byte in size?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk