Re: [boost] [locale] Formal review of Boost.Locale library EXTENDED

Subject: Re: [boost] [locale] Formal review of Boost.Locale library EXTENDED
From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-19 09:05:44

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday, April 19, 2011, Edward Diener wrote:
> My pick is to use what the language currently provides, which is
> wchar_t, which can represent UTF-16, a popular Unicode variant which
> also happens to be the standard for wide characters on Windows, which
> just happens to be the dominant operating system in the world ( by alot
> ) in terms of end-users.

I thought the standard was pretty loose about wchar_t, and that it could 
even legally be a single byte in size?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk2tiKgACgkQ5vihyNWuA4U+CACgiGdC1ifFlWJ79gMg6+F6NbBB
DVIAn0OPMucdhZI9W10qQiyer1AmQp7s
=BF9O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----