Subject: Re: [boost] [locale] Formal review of Boost.Locale library EXTENDED
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-19 09:38:48
Ryou Ezoe wrote:
> I don't care library internally convert between UTFs.
> At least, conversion between UTFs are trivial and more importantly
> consistent so I don't care.
> The user want to develop their software using their native language.
> Localization should be done by mapping their language to other languages.
> So the library should offer mapping to any unicode string to other
> unicode string.
But you have to propose something specific. How should the library be
changed? I asked a direct question: if the library accepts
translate( L"æ¥æ¬èª" )
encodes the wide literal as UTF-8 and uses it to look up a msgid in the .po
file, will this be enough for you? Or do you want something else, and if so,
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk