Subject: Re: [boost] [locale] Formal review of Boost.Locale library -- final days
From: Max Sobolev (macsmr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-22 05:08:43
On 22.04.2011 12:07, Henrik Sundberg wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Gordon Woodhull<gordon_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On Apr 22, 2011, at 2:00 AM, Vicente BOTET<vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> I don't like the OO design. I think that a more generic approach could be applied to this domain, and add a dynamic approach in top of the static one.
>>> The library should be redesigned with a generic approach and the interfaces be more user friendly and safe. I know the author is against the generic approach so I don't expect he will change later on if the library is accepted.
> Does this mean that you prefer to have no locale library instead of
> this one in Boost?
> It's not that the library is a sloppy work, as I see it. You just have
> different expectations.
all software aspects affect on the code quality and design is in the
first place. A Boost's library must have *excellent* quality but this
one isn't even good enough (IMO)
-- - Do you speak English? ÐÑÐ¶Ð¸Ðº Ñ Ð³Ð»ÑÐ±Ð¾ÐºÐ¸Ð¼ Ð²Ð·Ð´Ð¾Ñ Ð¾Ð¼: - Yes I do. Ð Ñ ÑÐ»Ð¸ ÑÐ¾Ð»ÐºÑ?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk