Re: [boost] [Set Pointer] Review Request

Subject: Re: [boost] [Set Pointer] Review Request
From: GMan (gmannickg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-22 21:33:42

> On 4/22/2011 9:08 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
>
>>
>> How about:
>> set_ptr<int> p = new set_node<int>(11);
>
>
set_ptr reminds me of std::set*, but maybe thats just me. Is "grouped_ptr" a
good idea? (Hoping it's not too much work for you to rename this stuff.)

-- 
GMan, Nick Gorski