Subject: Re: [boost] [Set Pointer] Review Request
From: Phil Bouchard (philippe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-22 21:47:50
On 4/22/2011 6:33 PM, GMan wrote:
> set_ptr reminds me of std::set*, but maybe thats just me. Is "grouped_ptr" a
> good idea? (Hoping it's not too much work for you to rename this stuff.)
set is shorter than grouped so it might be more convenient to type down.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk