Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Type Traits Extension by Frederic Bron - Review summary and decision
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-25 07:38:16
John Maddock wrote:
> > On 21.04.2011 23:13, Stewart, Robert wrote:
> >> Remember that "has_" implies ownership or inherent
> >> characteristic which doesn't apply to a namespace scope
> >> operator.
> Maybe, but there's no way to tell the difference between an
> operator defined as a member function, and one defined at
> namespace scope.
Granted, but there can be operators mixing UDTs, so it belongs to neither. "has_" just connotes the idea poorly to me.
> Plus we already have "has_new_operator".
That should have been "operator new," of course, because the new operator is a different animal. However, operator new must be a member function, so "has_" is the appropriate prefix.
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer using std::disclaimer;
Dev Tools & Components
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk