Subject: Re: [boost] Arguing about names in Boost libraries
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-25 11:48:26
> It's time for somebody to say this, so I will do it. A C++ identifier
> name, as long as it is vaguely about what the functionality entails, is
> perfectly adequate. It does not have to satisfy everyone in the
> universe. Period !
All I have to say on the matter really..... John.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk