Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in simple unformatted binary stream I/O?
From: Scott McMurray (me22.ca+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-28 23:15:21
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 18:43, Marsh Ray <marsh_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Rather than a machine and compiler-dependent binary IO facility based on
> iostreams, I'd rather have a simple, minimal, portable binary streaming
> interface that handled endianness and alignment well for wire-representation
> defined structures.
> <iostream> brings in a huge header tree with 99% unnecessary functionality
> for binary protocols. The more efficient the headers, the better. Functions
> that didn't need to read could just include the header for writing, and
Would you be fine with it working on streambufs? That way you'd only
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk