Re: [boost] Proposed documentation convention for pre-accepted libs

Subject: Re: [boost] Proposed documentation convention for pre-accepted libs
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-02 13:03:47

Marsh Ray wrote:
> On 05/02/2011 10:33 AM, Rene Rivera wrote:
> > On 5/1/2011 4:08 PM, Francisco José Tapia wrote:
> >> or if you want a quick look , you can see in my web page<
> >> http://fjtapia.webs.com/works/countertree/index.html>
> >
> > Please adjust your docs to make it *very* clear this is not
> > an official, or accepted, Boost C++ Library.
>
> I suggest that Boost adopt a convention for the documentation
> of libraries that are in the formally proposed or trial
> balloon state.

There were extensive discussions of that recently (within the last two years, anyway).

_____
Rob Stewart                           robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer                     using std::disclaimer;
Dev Tools & Components
Susquehanna International Group, LLP  http://www.sig.com

IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.