Subject: Re: [boost] [convert] Boost.Convert Library Review
From: Thomas Heller (thom.heller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-02 13:37:50
On Monday, May 02, 2011 07:12:14 PM Paul A. Bristow wrote:
> Does not make much sense to me either - BUT
> > > OTOH, the functionality exposed by convert is much needed and has to
> > > make it into Boost somehow.
> Strongly agree. We are missing out while trying to find the ideal solution.
> So I'd favour accepting Boost.Convert, but being prepared to fairly quickly
> deprecate/supersede it in favour of
> * A new version of lexical_cast which does take more arguments.
I strongly disagree here.
The boost.convert interface is broken by design! It should not be accepted as it
is right now.
I explicitly did not give a "conditional yes", because I believe that the
library will be completely different after fixing it.
You apparently waited so long now. Does another half a year (or let it be a
year) really make a difference?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk