Subject: Re: [boost] [tree] Reviving the tree library
From: Erik Erlandson (eerlands_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-07 21:32:16
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 17:17 -0500, Rene Rivera wrote:
> It looks like Bernhard stopped development 1.5 years ago. Which sure
> sounds like it's orphaned. Given that I've copied it over to
> sandbox/tree location (the last trunk state for it). I'm willing to help
> out in moving the library forward, especially since it's based on some
> of the core concepts I suggested. Who else is willing to help out in
> improving and finishing this lib? Note, that helping out involves
> thinking about adjusting the TR proposal so that it can be submitted for
> the soon to start up again TR2.
I propose renaming 'nary_tree' to just 'tree.' We have 'vector',
'list', 'map', etc. There should be a thing simply called 'tree', and I
think it should be whatever becomes the platonic ideal of an n-ary tree.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk