Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [tree] Reviving the tree library
From: Erik Erlandson (eerlands_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-07 21:32:16

Next message: Hartmut Kaiser: "Re: [boost] [proto][phoenix][msm] proto limits increased to 10, phoenix broken on trunk (was: [phoenix] not playing nice with other libs)"
Previous message: Vadim Stadnik: "[boost] [container_bptree] first version of submitted library"
In reply to: Rene Rivera: "[boost] [tree] Reviving the tree library (was: inquiry about proposing a new Boost library for a tree template container class)"
Next in thread: Erik Erlandson: "Re: [boost] inquiry about proposing a new Boost library for a tree template container class"

On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 17:17 -0500, Rene Rivera wrote:

> It looks like Bernhard stopped development 1.5 years ago. Which sure
> sounds like it's orphaned. Given that I've copied it over to
> sandbox/tree location (the last trunk state for it). I'm willing to help
> out in moving the library forward, especially since it's based on some
> of the core concepts I suggested. Who else is willing to help out in
> improving and finishing this lib? Note, that helping out involves
> thinking about adjusting the TR proposal so that it can be submitted for
> the soon to start up again TR2.

I propose renaming 'nary_tree' to just 'tree.' We have 'vector',
'list', 'map', etc. There should be a thing simply called 'tree', and I
think it should be whatever becomes the platonic ideal of an n-ary tree.

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk