Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Conversion: functors namming
From: TONGARI (tongari95_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-23 13:26:22
2011/5/15 Vicente BOTET <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]>
> during the Boost.Convert after review discussion there were some proposals
> to use Boost.Phoenix to build the functors.
> My question is what should be the name of the function that builds the
> functor. Some possibilities:
> short s=1;
> long l=3;
> using boost::phoenix::placeholders::_1;
> A- Use a different name: make_converter_to?
> s=boost::make_converter_to(*short*)(_1)(l) ;
> B- Use the same name in a different namespace. What about using "fp" as
> namespace (functional programming).
> s=boost::conversion::fp::convert_to(*short*)(_1)(l) ;
Proto uses a separate namespace boost::proto::functional for such, so I
think it's OK for Convert as well, while 'sp' is being too succinct, I think
it'd be better to leave such tiny naming for the users themselves.
If 'functional' is too long, maybe 'lazy' is a good choice...If this is your
> C- Use the same name in the same namespace and use SFINAE/enable_if to
> select the correct implementation depending on the parameter.
Maybe it's just a simple overloading without SFINAE. But this may imply that
it's tied to Phoenix actor...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk