Re: [boost] [review] Heaps

Subject: Re: [boost] [review] Heaps
From: Andrew Sutton (asutton.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-06-01 10:25:48

These are good observations.

> Two additional points:
>
> 1. Most participating via Code Collaborator should be "observers," not "reviewers."  The latter are expected to "accept" each comment and defect.  My suggestion is that the review manager be the sole "reviewer."

I agree with this in principle, but I'm curious to hear if there are
any dissenting opinions :)

> 2. Code Collaborator should not be used for design level discussion or for the final review message that answers the traditional questions, including whether to accept the library.

I find the communication features of Code Collaborator lacking for
precisely this reason and would also prefer to discuss and debate
high-level design issues on the mailing list.

Andrew