Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc] boost.simd news from the front.
From: Greg Rubino (bibil.thaysose_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-06-06 07:17:06
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Greg Rubino <bibil.thaysose_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Mathias Gaunard
> <mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Mathieu meant that the library layout is similar to that of Phoenix in that
>> there are several more-or-less independent components.
>> Phoenix has the core, the operator, the bind and the scope components (and
>> probably others I'm forgetting).
>> It's also the case for Boost.SIMD where functions are grouped together into
>> That notwithstanding, Boost.SIMD does use expression templates and lazy
>> objects in a way that is a bit similar to Phoenix.
> Does that mean that Boost.SIMD expressions can be used in Boost.Spirit grammars?
By that I mean in semantic actions, not as rules. That might not have
been as obvious as I thought.
>> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk