Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc] boost.simd news from the front.
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-06-06 08:12:01
On 06/06/2011 13:17, Greg Rubino wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Greg Rubino<bibil.thaysose_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Mathias Gaunard
>> <mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> Mathieu meant that the library layout is similar to that of Phoenix in that
>>> there are several more-or-less independent components.
>>> Phoenix has the core, the operator, the bind and the scope components (and
>>> probably others I'm forgetting).
>>> It's also the case for Boost.SIMD where functions are grouped together into
>>> That notwithstanding, Boost.SIMD does use expression templates and lazy
>>> objects in a way that is a bit similar to Phoenix.
>> Does that mean that Boost.SIMD expressions can be used in Boost.Spirit grammars?
> By that I mean in semantic actions, not as rules. That might not have
> been as obvious as I thought.
They're Proto expressions just like Phoenix and Spirit; but I'm not sure
what this means exactly with regards to your question.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk