Subject: Re: [boost] Is there interest in e_float:Multiple-precisionfloatand special functions?
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-06-11 04:33:03
>For generic elementary transcendental functions, Icould either template
>them or utilize the virtual mechanism.
>I would prefer the templates. Do you have a preference?
>Perhaps we should leave the option open to target up to millions of digits
>in future versions of e_float.
>(I mean quite a bit later, after building a solid basis for e_float in
>boost in the first place.)
>See next paragraph.
They would have to be templates otherwise they're not generic ;-)
There are also some conceptual architypes in Boost.Math that can be used to
verify that they'll work with any type that fulfils those concept
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk