Re: [boost] [1.48.0] Schedule discussion

Subject: Re: [boost] [1.48.0] Schedule discussion
From: Thomas Klimpel (Thomas.Klimpel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-06-20 15:47:21

Daniel James wrote:
> If we want to have longer beta periods and point releases, it's worth
> considering slowing down a little, perhaps 4 month release cycles,
> giving 3 releases a year.

+1

And if point releases could be avoided as much as possible, it would be even better.
 
Regards,
Thomas