Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Is there interest in e_float:Multiple-precisionfloatand special functions?
From: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. (jeffrey.hellrung_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-06-23 14:23:33

Next message: Brandon Kohn: "Re: [boost] numeric_cast"
Previous message: Olaf van der Spek: "Re: [boost] [algorithm] to_lower_copy / to_upper_copy with no output param assumes sequence to be same as input"
In reply to: Christopher Kormanyos: "Re: [boost] Is there interest in e_float:Multiple-precisionfloatand special functions?"
Next in thread: Christopher Kormanyos: "Re: [boost] Is there interest in e_float:Multiple-precisionfloatand special functions?"
Reply: Christopher Kormanyos: "Re: [boost] Is there interest in e_float:Multiple-precisionfloatand special functions?"
Reply: Christopher Kormanyos: "Re: [boost] Is there interest in e_float:Multiple-precisionfloatand special functions?"

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Christopher Kormanyos <e_float_at_[hidden]>wrote:
[...]

> Remember, e_float in its present form only goes up to 300 digits.

[...]

I'm curious, what are the reasons for this limitation? I may have missed
this in previous discussion...

- Jeff

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk