Subject: Re: [boost] [test] [iostreams] 1.47.0 VC++ 10.0 warnings
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-12 06:01:18
On 11 July 2011 18:19, Daniel James <dnljms_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Since iostreams is unmaintained, the easiest solution would be to
> build it with a lower warning level. A handful of warnings are the
> least of its problems.
On second thoughts, it'd probably be better to only include it in the
build if it's explicitly asked for.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk