Subject: Re: [boost] logging
From: Gordon Woodhull (gordon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-14 09:44:19
On Jul 13, 2011, at 12:27 PM, Jeff Graham wrote:
> So after 16 months and 2 releases, what is the plan?
So, do you have another logging library to propose to Boost?
Seriously folks, yes it has been a long time, but the conditions on acceptance were pretty strong , including pretty much mandating Phoenix v3, which has only just been released. There's a thread from late March which explains all of this .
Speaking as someone who followed this review closely but found that others had already covered every point I could think of, it seems to me that Andrey chose an "everything including the kitchen sink" design (which I like) and it was bound to take a lot of work to bring it up to everyone's expectations. I urge patience.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk