Subject: Re: [boost] sandbox or boost vault
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-15 16:41:37
On 7/15/2011 3:33 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> on Fri Jul 15 2011, Sean Farrow<sean.farrow-AT-seanfarrow.co.uk> wrote:
>> Given that the boost vault has been down for quite a few months,
>> where are all new bosot libraries going for review, in the boost
>> vault-with a different url, or in the boost sandbox in the svn
>> repository? Any help appreciated. Regards
> Well, it's "back up" in a manner of speaking. Your old URLs will send
> you someplace below http://github.com/boost-vault. Redirection is far
> from perfect, but it usually puts you in the right neighborhood.
> However, it's not intended that you put your library there for review.
> Ideally, you should get your own github account and publish the library
> that way.
When and how that decision made? When and how was it communicated? Has
the documentation for library submission been changed to reflect this?
Did I miss something from the steering committee?
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk