Re: [boost] [infrastructure] The vault vs. project hosting vs. Boost hosting?

Subject: Re: [boost] [infrastructure] The vault vs. project hosting vs. Boost hosting?
From: Thomas Heller (thom.heller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-18 02:29:58

On Sunday, July 17, 2011 03:05:40 PM Rene Rivera wrote:
> On 7/17/2011 11:48 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> > on Sat Jul 16 2011, Rene Rivera<grafikrobot-AT-gmail.com>  wrote:
> > The priority should be on convenience for reviewers rather than for
> > submitters, as there are hopefully many more of the former than the
> > latter.  As a reviewer, I really want to be able to review all of the
> > code and documentation on the web.  I'd also like the source to be
> > presented in a SCM repository to ease integration of review commentary,
> > etc.  For me, this all points toward using a public repo hosting
> > service like GitHub.
> 
> +1; In a dream world there would be a project hosting service that would
> allow many types of SCM clients to get the code regardless of what the
> author used to put the code in with.

FWIW, github lets you checkout and commit through svn:
https://github.com/blog/626-announcing-svn-support
and
https://github.com/blog/644-subversion-write-support