Subject: Re: [boost] [fusion] html docs woes
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-18 21:07:03
On 7/18/2011 8:53 PM, Joel de Guzman wrote:
> On 7/18/2011 5:10 PM, Daniel James wrote:
>> On 18 July 2011 08:33, Joel de Guzman <joel_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> I think what Eric is saying is that if you have to update from SVN anyway,
>>> then Daniel James's solution is reasonable: redirects in subversion
>>> to take you to the rebuilt docs, which means that 1) when you do a regen
>>> of the docs, you don't commit the HTML pages 2) You upload the docs somewhere
>>> where you can redirect to.
>>> Seems reasonable...
>>> What I am not sure about is that it seems that the steps needed to do this
>>> is basically the same (or even more laborious ?) than just committing the
>>> HTMLs. After all, quickbook/docbook is now better at avoiding extra diffs
>>> from regens.
>> You don't have to upload the documentation yourself. Every few days I
>> run a script which builds and uploads the documentation.
> That's good. Thanks, for doing this, Daniel!
For the record, I'm still unsure about which procedure to follow,
but I'm glad to know that there are other reasonable solutions.
I still dislike having to regen the docs when I am offline. While
it is true that Eric says it's just a bjam away, well, it's still
a bjam away. Often, I am in the middle of something and I need to
know a function or typedef or something. Having to bjam and wait for
the regen to finish just to get that crucial info gets in the way
of the thought-flow. OTOH, I'm mostly online anyway. And, you can always
have the full release at hand, with all the docs; -- unless of course
when you need something new from the trunk.
There's always a tradeoff, if anyone else out there cares about this,
then please share your voice for the sake of consensus.
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://boost-spirit.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk