Subject: Re: [boost] [fusion] html docs woes
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-18 08:53:04
On 7/18/2011 5:10 PM, Daniel James wrote:
> On 18 July 2011 08:33, Joel de Guzman <joel_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I think what Eric is saying is that if you have to update from SVN anyway,
>> then Daniel James's solution is reasonable: redirects in subversion
>> to take you to the rebuilt docs, which means that 1) when you do a regen
>> of the docs, you don't commit the HTML pages 2) You upload the docs somewhere
>> where you can redirect to.
>> Seems reasonable...
>> What I am not sure about is that it seems that the steps needed to do this
>> is basically the same (or even more laborious ?) than just committing the
>> HTMLs. After all, quickbook/docbook is now better at avoiding extra diffs
>> from regens.
> You don't have to upload the documentation yourself. Every few days I
> run a script which builds and uploads the documentation.
That's good. Thanks, for doing this, Daniel!
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://boost-spirit.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk