Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [regex] How robust are the <boost/regex/pending/unicode_iterator.hpp> adapters?
From: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. (jeffrey.hellrung_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-19 17:41:21

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:08 AM, John Maddock <boost.regex_at_[hidden]>wrote:

> Actually, I'm thinking that the fix may be easier than I thought after all
> - if I add a 2-arg "range-checked" constructor as an overload, then the
> iterator's constructor can validate the end-points of the underlying
> sequence during construction, and there's no need to otherwise change the
> implementation or add overhead by checking every increment/decrement for
> movement out-of-range because we'll know that it can't happen.

...unless the characters are modified in between traversal operations. I
don't know if that's a legitimate concern or not, just thought I'd bring it
up :/ *If* it's remotely a concern, probably sufficient to just document
this limitation...?

- Jeff

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at