Subject: Re: [boost] [Lockfree review] Meta-comments
From: Tim Blechmann (tim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-21 12:21:50
> 3. This has already been discussed to some extent, but why are we
> reviewing this before Boost.Atomic?
the review is part of my summer-of-code program, so it will need to be finished
before mid of august. waiting for boost.atomic to be reviewed might defer the
boost.lockfree review for undefined time.
> I think Boost.Atomic is an
> urgently-required library. What can we all do to help it get submitted
> and accepted as soon as possible?
the original author is quite unresponsive. i haven't heard from him since early
this year, and he did not repond to any emails i've sent him.
imo, a few people should gather and adopt the library, because i fear that it
has been orphaned ...
then we would only need a review manager and a time slot.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk