Subject: [boost] shared_ptr<>: why no operator ?
From: dgwsoft (gareth_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-26 18:39:37
boost::shared_ptr<int> p(new int(42));
To access elements of the array I can do:
p.get() = 7;
But wouldn't it be nicer to do:
p = 7; // ?
So: why is no T& operator(int) defined for shared_ptr ? I'm just
interested in the design reasons for this.
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/shared-ptr-why-no-operator-tp3697208p3697208.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk