Re: [boost] [fusion] segmented fusion 2.0

Subject: Re: [boost] [fusion] segmented fusion 2.0
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-08-11 05:18:41

On 08/11/2011 06:28 AM, Eric Niebler wrote:

> Also, some containers and views are naturally segmented, like
> joint_view. Practically all of joint_view's implementation, including
> its iterator, would vanish if it just advertised itself as segmented.
>
> Thoughts? Objections?

I don't think the flat iterator of joint_view should disappear.
A segmented fusion sequence should also be iterable like a flat fusion 
sequence if I'm willing to pay the price.