Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] The Lonely Song of the MPL Maintainer -- or Boost support for antediluvian compiler and the future supprot of C++11
From: Gordon Woodhull (gordon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-08-13 13:52:56

Next message: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [gsoc] Request Feedback for Boost.Ustr Unicode String Adapter"
Previous message: Hartmut Kaiser: "Re: [boost] The Lonely Song of the MPL Maintainer -- or Boost support for antediluvian compiler and the future supprot of C++11"
In reply to: Hartmut Kaiser: "Re: [boost] The Lonely Song of the MPL Maintainer -- or Boost support for antediluvian compiler and the future supprot of C++11"
Next in thread: David A. Greene: "Re: [boost] The Lonely Song of the MPL Maintainer -- or Boost support for antediluvian compiler and the future supprot of C++11"
Reply: David A. Greene: "Re: [boost] The Lonely Song of the MPL Maintainer -- or Boost support for antediluvian compiler and the future supprot of C++11"
Reply: Larry Evans: "Re: [boost] The Lonely Song of the MPL Maintainer -- or Boost support for antediluvian compiler and the future supprot of C++11"

On Aug 13, 2011, at 1:21 PM, "Hartmut Kaiser" <hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> so why not leave the existing MPL
> alone and start over?

Is there any reason a variadic MPL would have a different interface? I.e. could we have a clean MPL'11 with the same interface, and leave the old workarounds to rot?

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk