Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] The Lonely Song of the MPL Maintainer -- or Boost support for antediluvian compiler and the future supprot of C++11
From: Vicente Botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-08-14 10:52:29


Joel falcou-4 wrote:
>
> On 14/08/11 14:09, Edward Diener wrote:
>> I agree with you but any Boost library still has to support C++03 for a
>> good while until compiler vendors catch up with the C++11 standard.
>
> I am :
>
> 1/ requesting dropping support for non 03 compliant compiler
> 2/ starting a C++11 only branch of boost
>
> not the mix of both.
>
>

Hi Joel,

I don't know, but I guess that the list of 03 compliant compilers will be
quite short. Have you a list?

How do you qualify a C++11 only branch?
One that supports only C++11 compliant compilers?
One that uses only standard C++11 libraries and itself or could libraries on
this branch use libraries on the current Boost branch?

Could you clarify?

Best,
Vicente

--
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/The-Lonely-Song-of-the-MPL-Maintainer-or-Boost-support-for-antediluvian-compiler-and-the-future-supp1-tp3741628p3743017.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk