Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [containers review] A reminder that the containers review ends tomorrow
From: Stephan T. Lavavej (stl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-08-14 12:50:42

Next message: Andrew Hundt: "Re: [boost] Interest in Boost.Array companion: StaticVector - A statically allocated fixed capacity vector"
Previous message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] The Lonely Song of the MPL Maintainer -- or Boost support for antediluvian compiler and the future supprot of C++11"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [containers review] A reminder that the containers review ends tomorrow"
Next in thread: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [boost] [containers review] A reminder that the containers review ends tomorrow"

> Review of Boost.Contianer by Zoltán Tóth
> 2. Most STL implementations have been supporting stateful
> allocators for years now. So it is not big news. However I am not satisfied
> with the way they might do it. For example Visual Studio's STL
> implementation require the allocator type to have a template copy
> constructor. Such allocator types are difficult to be implemented in
> efficient, threads-friendly way.

This is a Standard requirement, not specific to VC.

Stephan T. Lavavej
Visual C++ Libraries Developer

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk