Re: [boost] [C++0x] ISO/IEC approves C++0x standard!

Subject: Re: [boost] [C++0x] ISO/IEC approves C++0x standard!
From: Ben Robinson (icaretaker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-08-15 15:34:13

According to Scott Meyers, that joke is so 0x0A (see
http://skillsmatter.com/podcast/home/move-semanticsperfect-forwarding-and-rvalue-references
).

Ben Robinson, Ph.D.

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Richard Hadsell <hadsell_at_[hidden]
> wrote:

> On 08/15/2011 09:36 AM, Ian Emmons wrote:
>
>> Shouldn't it be C++0b? <wink/>
>>
> But that would start an endless battle over whether it should be C++0b or
> C++0B.
>
> --
> Dick Hadsell                    203-992-6320  Fax: [phone]
> Reply-to:                       hadsell_at_[hidden]
> Blue Sky Studios                http://www.blueskystudios.com
> 1 American Lane, Greenwich, CT 06831-2560
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/**
> mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost<http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost>
>