Re: [boost] [C++0x] ISO/IEC approves C++0x standard!

Subject: Re: [boost] [C++0x] ISO/IEC approves C++0x standard!
From: David Bellot (david.bellot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-08-16 03:54:43

it seems B uses more black pixels than b and therefore save energy on a
screen !!!!
For the same reason, b consumes less ink on a printer.

:-D
Pffffff

my 2 cents....

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 16:15, Richard Hadsell
<hadsell_at_[hidden]>wrote:

> On 08/15/2011 09:36 AM, Ian Emmons wrote:
>
>> Shouldn't it be C++0b? <wink/>
>>
> But that would start an endless battle over whether it should be C++0b or
> C++0B.
>
> --
> Dick Hadsell                    203-992-6320  Fax: [phone]
> Reply-to:                       hadsell_at_[hidden]
> Blue Sky Studios                http://www.blueskystudios.com
> 1 American Lane, Greenwich, CT 06831-2560
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/**
> mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost<http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost>
>