Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [C++0x] ISO/IEC approves C++0x standard!
From: John Bytheway (jbytheway+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-08-16 04:38:49


On 16/08/11 00:33, Edward Diener wrote:
<snip>
> I was really asking what informal nomenclature will most likely be used
> to refer to the new C++ standard. It seems C++11 will probably be the
> way it will informally be called, and not C++0x as many have gotten used
> to referring to it while it was still in the process of standardization.

I think the most important consideration for this is what the gcc
argument to the -std option is that deprecates c++0x. AFAICS, they
haven't chosen that yet.

John


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk