Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [interest] underlying type library
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-08-22 16:20:44

On 8/22/2011 3:50 PM, Ion Gaztañaga wrote:
> We still have to explore "destructive move" semantics. We have move
> semantics. We can even declare a traits like
> "has_trivial_destructor_after_move" to optimize a bit more vector
> reallocations once we've moved some value_types (we avoid calling
> destructors that do nothing useful once moved). Destructive move
> semantics could be a step further, we need to explore destructive
> move semantics in containers and algorithms. Some problems with
> destructive move semantics here:

Interesting! Thanks for the reference.

Eric Niebler
BoostPro Computing

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at