Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [lockfree] review
From: Stephan T. Lavavej (stl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-08-25 13:00:34

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [type_traits] is_enum on scoped enums doesn't works as expected"
Previous message: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] [type_traits] is_enum on scoped enums doesn't works as expected"
In reply to: Gottlob Frege: "Re: [boost] [lockfree] review"
Next in thread: Alexander Terekhov: "Re: [boost] [lockfree] review"
Reply: Alexander Terekhov: "Re: [boost] [lockfree] review"

[Gottlob Frege]
> What's the "independent reads, independent writes" problem? I've
> probably heard, seen, or mistakenly had a bug due to it once, but
> don't know it by name.

Here's one explanation: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2177.html

(I am not an expert here, but I try to be aware of what I don't know.)

STL

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [type_traits] is_enum on scoped enums doesn't works as expected"
Previous message: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] [type_traits] is_enum on scoped enums doesn't works as expected"
In reply to: Gottlob Frege: "Re: [boost] [lockfree] review"
Next in thread: Alexander Terekhov: "Re: [boost] [lockfree] review"
Reply: Alexander Terekhov: "Re: [boost] [lockfree] review"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk