Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [stopwatches] About reducing the scope of the library
From: Gordon Woodhull (gordon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-07 22:30:12

Next message: Mostafa: "Re: [boost] [optional] Thoughts on disallowing assignment for wrapped references."
Previous message: Joe Mucchiello: "Re: [boost] [Submission] RawMemory (24-bit integers and runtime-dispatch)"
In reply to: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "[boost] [stopwatches] About reducing the scope of the library"
Next in thread: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] [stopwatches] About reducing the scope of the library"
Reply: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] [stopwatches] About reducing the scope of the library"

On Sep 7, 2011, at 5:35 PM, "Vicente J. Botet Escriba" <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Do you think that it is worth proposing an addition to Boost.Chrono that provides only stopwatches (without reporting)?

It would be really nice to have a replacement for Boost.Timer ASAP. Perhaps it would make sense to introduce something simple as a Chrono example, and then decide how to expand it into a library later?

Not sure if this answers your question. I haven't looked closely.

Thanks
Gordon

Next message: Mostafa: "Re: [boost] [optional] Thoughts on disallowing assignment for wrapped references."
Previous message: Joe Mucchiello: "Re: [boost] [Submission] RawMemory (24-bit integers and runtime-dispatch)"
In reply to: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "[boost] [stopwatches] About reducing the scope of the library"
Next in thread: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] [stopwatches] About reducing the scope of the library"
Reply: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] [stopwatches] About reducing the scope of the library"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk