Re: [boost] [stopwatches] About reducing the scope of the library

Subject: Re: [boost] [stopwatches] About reducing the scope of the library
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-09 15:10:26

Le 08/09/11 04:30, Gordon Woodhull a écrit :
>
> On Sep 7, 2011, at 5:35 PM, "Vicente J. Botet Escriba"<vicente.botet_at_[hidden]>  wrote:
>
>> Do you think that it is worth proposing an addition to Boost.Chrono that provides only stopwatches (without reporting)?
> It would be really nice to have a replacement for Boost.Timer ASAP. Perhaps it would make sense to introduce something simple as a Chrono example, and then decide how to expand it into a library later?
I don't know what  do you consider a simple example. Do this simple 
example report on standard output the time slapsed? Could you give one, 
please? This will help me a lot.
>
> Not sure if this answers your question. I haven't looked closely.
I will be interested in your opinion. Let me know what do you think is 
you have time to look closely.

Best,
Vicente