Subject: Re: [boost] [stopwatches] About reducing the scope of the library
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-09 15:10:26
Le 08/09/11 04:30, Gordon Woodhull a écrit :
> On Sep 7, 2011, at 5:35 PM, "Vicente J. Botet Escriba"<vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Do you think that it is worth proposing an addition to Boost.Chrono that provides only stopwatches (without reporting)?
> It would be really nice to have a replacement for Boost.Timer ASAP. Perhaps it would make sense to introduce something simple as a Chrono example, and then decide how to expand it into a library later?
I don't know what do you consider a simple example. Do this simple
example report on standard output the time slapsed? Could you give one,
please? This will help me a lot.
> Not sure if this answers your question. I haven't looked closely.
I will be interested in your opinion. Let me know what do you think is
you have time to look closely.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk