Subject: Re: [boost] [Endian] Review
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-08 16:07:00
On 09/08/2011 12:23 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Tomas Puverle <
> Tomas.Puverle_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> However, as I said, that's my personal preference and last year plenty of
>> people wanted to see the operators included. Perhaps they could be a
>> endian<..., bool EnableOperators_ > ?
> I'll give it some thought, but my initial reaction is that endian is already
> more complex than I like, so I'm leery of adding yet more complexity.
If you don't want the operators, then don't use
them. Having an extra template parameter to
disable them seems rather pointless.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk