Re: [boost] [Endian] Review

Subject: Re: [boost] [Endian] Review
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-08 16:07:00

AMDG

On 09/08/2011 12:23 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Tomas Puverle <
> Tomas.Puverle_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
>>
>> However, as I said, that's my personal preference and last year plenty of
>> people wanted to see the operators included.  Perhaps they could be a
>> policy?
>>
>> endian<..., bool EnableOperators_ > ?
>>
> 
> I'll give it some thought, but my initial reaction is that endian is already
> more complex than I like, so I'm leery of adding yet more complexity.
> 

If you don't want the operators, then don't use
them.  Having an extra template parameter to
disable them seems rather pointless.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe