Subject: Re: [boost] [Endian] Review / Comments
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-09 08:54:02
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Tim Blechmann <tim_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > hi,
> > documentation
> > the documentation in general is pretty short, but sufficient: the
> concepts of
> > the library are easy, so there is no need to go into more details.
> > however i would prefer if the documentation uses quickbook/boostbook.
> most of
> > the recent boost libraries have a very similar layout of the
> > but the boost.endian docs do not follow these conventions.
> quickbook/boostbook has matured, so I'll take a look. But no promises.
Paul Bristow kindly offered to help get me started with converting the docs
to quickbook/boostbook. I accepted as quickly as my fingers could type:-)
But nothing will happen until after the review.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk