Re: [boost] [Endian] Review / Comments

Subject: Re: [boost] [Endian] Review / Comments
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-09 08:54:02

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Tim Blechmann <tim_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > documentation
> > the documentation in general is pretty short, but sufficient: the
> concepts of
> > the library are easy, so there is no need to go into more details.
> > however i would prefer if the documentation uses quickbook/boostbook.
> most of
> > the recent boost libraries have a very similar layout of the
> documentation,
> > but the boost.endian docs do not follow these conventions.
>
> quickbook/boostbook has matured, so I'll take a look. But no promises.
>

Paul Bristow kindly offered to help get me started with converting the docs
to quickbook/boostbook. I accepted as quickly as my fingers could type:-)
But nothing will happen until after the review.

--Beman