Subject: Re: [boost] [Endian] Review
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-09 09:05:35
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Vicente Botet <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]>wrote:
> I have separated the endian class into a endian_pack that is integer
> agnostic and an endian class that behaves as an integer (You could see the
> details in the Sandbox under endian_ext).
> Reference docs:
> (Sorry but there is a bad link to the reference)
> This is not complex
Complexity is in the eye of the beholder. To me, that approach was markedly
more complex and confusing.
> and allows to define physical structures that can be
> used only at the I/O frontier.
See my reply to Phil Endecott (this morning, 9/9/11) for an example of doing
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk