Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [proto] Looong compile times and other issues
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-13 07:44:07

On 9/13/2011 5:22 PM, Joel Falcou wrote:
> On 13/09/2011 04:08, Joel de Guzman wrote:
>> Sorry about that. I was just reacting to Joel F's note saying
>> "- fusion is also a big hitter" in a thread titled "[proto]
>> Looong compile times and other issues". I was just defending
>> Fusion with clear proof that the overhead is not due to Fusion
>> and that proof happens to come from Phoenix2 which uses Fusion
>> exclusively.
>> I agree. Let's not point fingers. I would've expected Joel F to
>> substantiate any claims like that with real numbers, lest it
>> starts to sound more like spreading FUD.
>> Regards,
> Shortcut are to be blamed, qs Eric said, I was pointign out that, in some case, the
> cocktail fusion in proto transform leads to surprising CT and that, before seeign John
> code, it *may* be the case. I am using Fusion et al. for like eveyrthign, I start to know
> when and how stuff an get wrong, i wont take on me to spread FUDs on this subject.

Ok, fair enough. I'm sorry if I overreacted. I did not intend to
say that you are intentionally spreading FUD. What I meant to say
is that sweeping statements like that are easily misconstrued and
should better be substantiated by sufficient explanation, code
and real benchmarks.


Joel de Guzman

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at