Re: [boost] [timer] Boost Timer Library Version 2

Subject: Re: [boost] [timer] Boost Timer Library Version 2
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-27 17:08:40

Le 27/09/11 17:42, Stewart, Robert a écrit :
> CPU Timers page: - There's no information on thread safety. stop(), 
> for example is not reentrant.
I guess that the functions are not thread-safe, as it is the case of 
Boost.Stopwatch. As far as the timers/stopwatches are stored on the 
stack there is no problem. The problem appears when the user shares 
these timers/stopwatches between several threads.
>
>   - There's no information on Boost.Timers overhead relative to
>     timing the target code.
>
Are you asking for the overhead of the time computations or the reporting?

Best,
Vicente