Subject: Re: [boost] [timer] Boost Timer Library Version 2
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-28 07:12:45
Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> Le 27/09/11 17:42, Stewart, Robert a écrit :
> > CPU Timers page: - There's no information on thread safety.
> I guess that the functions are not thread-safe, as it is the
> case of Boost.Stopwatch. As far as the timers/stopwatches are
> stored on the stack there is no problem. The problem appears
> when the user shares these timers/stopwatches between several
Sure, I think that's probably right. I was just pointing out that there's no documentation regarding thread safety.
> > - There's no information on Boost.Timers overhead relative
> > to timing the target code.
> Are you asking for the overhead of the time computations or
> the reporting?
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer using std::disclaimer;
Dev Tools & Components
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk