Subject: Re: [boost] Would Unicomm be interesting for Boost?
From: Gordon Woodhull (gordon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-29 17:43:53
On Sep 28, 2011, at 6:10 PM, Dmtitry Timoshenko wrote:
> I finished developing the communication library based on STL, Boost. The communcation is implemented by using Boost.Asio. The library is
> engine that allows to build any network protocols based on TCP transport. Unicomm hides communication details and makes focus on business logic. I read the requirements for the library submission. The Unicomm is close to them. But there is still some work to make it possible it to join Boost.
Have you compared your library with the proposed Boost.Network?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk