Subject: Re: [boost] [test] Trunk broken: What happened to test_exec_monitor?
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-10-06 18:44:52
Belcourt, Kenneth <kbelco <at> sandia.gov> writes:
> I have very limited time to debug code for Boost.
> Frankly what little time I have I'd rather be working on
> library submissions to Boost.
And I on developing new features. Spending it on guesswork based on close to
zero information may not be productive as well.
> Attached is a stack trace from one of the failing tests.
> From what I can tell, there's one serious problem
> that impacts all the failing Boost.Test tests as they
Yes, but it's unclear from the stack you provided. Stack looks fine to me.
> Perhaps conditional compilation specific to Darwin Intel
> is mismatched between header and source?
How would they look like?
> Another idea, what's different about the seven
> Boost.Test results that pass for Darwin Intel from the
> rest of those that fail?
Six of them are not using UTF at all and one does not do anything with it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk